Episode 16 — From Rules to Learning: Why ML Beat Expert Systems
This episode reviews the transition from expert systems, which dominated AI development in the 1970s and 1980s, to the rise of machine learning approaches that define the field today. Expert systems relied on hand-crafted rules built by domain specialists, encoding knowledge as if-then statements. While effective for narrow domains, they struggled with scalability, ambiguity, and constant maintenance needs. Machine learning offered a new approach: instead of manually programming every rule, algorithms could learn patterns directly from data. For certification exams, understanding this historical shift helps explain why machine learning is emphasized over symbolic rule-based systems and why data-driven approaches are central to modern AI.
We expand with examples of limitations and advantages. An expert system for medical diagnosis could only handle conditions encoded in its knowledge base and required costly updates whenever guidelines changed. In contrast, a supervised learning model can improve as more labeled patient data is collected, adjusting automatically to new cases. Troubleshooting considerations include recognizing that machine learning is not always superior; for well-defined, rule-based tasks, symbolic systems may still be useful. Exam questions often probe this contrast, asking which approach is better suited to a described problem. Learners who master the trade-offs gain a clearer sense of why machine learning displaced expert systems and how both approaches remain relevant in the broader AI toolkit. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your certification path.
